These are self assembling nanomaterials which will slowly keep assembling. Nanotechnology. But not necessarily a robot. The more it jives around via brownian motion and RF agitation the more it will collide into other compatible Parts. Pfizer and many other drugs have these materials clearly bisible in them and you will find them in bloods also.
Thanks for your valued comment, Karl. You may well be right but I'm not currently persuaded on this. I'm with you on nanotech invasion via the hydrogels and self-assembly nanoparticles but I'm tending to veer towards a combination and diabolical collaboration between nanotech and CDB (Cross Domain Bacteria as laid out by Clifford Carnicom).
Although this snakey "thing" is mechanical and jerky in movement, I'm now thinking it's possibly hybrid (engineered) bacteria (CDB) that performs an engineered role in association with the engineered nanotech. Maybe these hybrid bacteria are being utilised to thrash about and collide other nanoparticles in order to assist the overall self-assembly of nanotech?
I believe the Dystopian Plotters have unleashed stealth engineered bacteria on humanity alongside stealth engineered nanotech. A transhumanists' dream of merging synthetic biology with electro-mechanical nanotechnology. "They" need the Trojan horse hybrid bacteria to weaken biological defences (nobble red blood cells) and open the gates for the nanotech invaders.
Thank you, Patti. I think you may be right. Assuming it's a bacteria, I've narrowed it down to this rough area of rod-type bacteria but not specifically spirochete. The jerky or snakey movement reveals the 'joints' but there's maybe one or two other possible variants, a corkscrew one and a filamentous one.
I've also observed these in brightfield - a string of many dots threaded together. They do jerk about almost mechanically and they're several microns long.
For these darkfield video clips I was using no oil, only the 40X Objective. I sometimes use the oil with the 100X Objective for nitty-gritty zooming into maximum detail but it was not possible to use with this fast-moving bacteria or bot.
Yes - and I agree with you, it's often better for seeing details, including the bacteria. I usually start with brightfield, scoot around the slide to get a good overall picture of key features, then switch to darkfield. Darkfield is fabulous for colourful detail if you get it right but it can be fraught with problems if certain things go wrong (in my early experience of using it).
Unfortunately, I had problems with darkfield for many weeks which was extremely frustrating. The oil kept running off the oil immersion unit and failing to link to the under side of the slide. I discovered that it was crucial to use an alcohol wipe, not a paper tissue, for cleaning off after use. Also, the connecting screw got worn out in the process, so I may need a replacement screw before long.
Nigel I found microscopy on YouTube to be immensely helpful in identifying bacteria and parasitic infections in blood cells and outside of them. I still go there and search to identify what I'm seeing. It's helped me a lot. We cannot see viruses unless we have a university level electron microscope. But mycoplasmas and everything else is fair game.
Thanks, Patti. Yes, I've found quite a lot on YouTube to my surprise. Erm, on 'viruses' though, I'm squarely in the 'no virus exists' camp, as none has ever been proven to exist EVER (Drs. Baileys, Cowan, Kaufman and Christine Massey etc). So, I regard 'viruses' as a tool of medical oppression that fuelled the Political Plandemics (1 & 2) 100 years apart AND the entire fake and toxic 'vaccine' industry.
Nigel even some ofthe corkscrew ones have jerky movements. There are lots of examples of these on YouTube microscopy sites. However I have some scope pictures of a large heavy looking silver colored parasite with what looks like eyes on a large head and body that trails off slimmer to its end. Found it in a doc friends blood 2 years ago. Other smaller ones were also present.
Yikes! Eyes and a large head and body! It's fatal to look down the microscope. It's quite shocking as it reveals all sorts of horrors. My fear is that any of these bacterial 'worm-like' variants might be really quite long (100_ microns). Some of the large filaments I've photographed (such as in my last post of yesterday) were snake-like. I keep coming across snake-like clues. Quite creepy and scary, especially after watching Maria Crisler talking to Dr. Mihalcea recently ... on snakey worms in the body. https://rumble.com/v4owm6l-episode-15-ai-nanotech-and-synthetic-biology-in-humanity-conversation-with-.html
It's great to be talking with you. Have you seen the strands that form up in vaxed blood that wrap rbcs into the strands formation? I have a lots of pictures of those.
It's good to be talking with you, too. No, I don't think I've seen those strands. That sounds interesting. It sounds like some form of goulish enslavement process, readying the rbcs for parasitic devourment.
You're right, we are the test bed and our survival is not their top priority. They don't care about our health, safety and well-being at all. They're trying to kill us off through stealth vectors - in order to 'save the planet' ... for themselves and their technocratic New World Order.
I'm confident that although I've seen horrible microscopy images from my own blood samples, my immunity is still strong enough to keep any invasive bacteria or nanobot at bay. (Same applies to most people, of course).
'The Thing' (somatid/bacteria/bot) in these video clips has grown on the microscope slide after about 2 hours - unchallenged by an active immune system response - but inside the body, hopefully, that's a different matter; any invader should get terminated by my trusty white blood cells. However, the nagging worry is that there may be significant invasion of these things. Who knows? It's not over 'till it's over, as the saying goes.
Nigel leave your slide on the scope overnight and see if microtubules start growing out of the blood on the slide. They will try to connect up with nearby tubeless to form a grid. Confirm this for me. I'm in the US are you in the UK?
Yes, I do routinely leave my slide on the scope overnight or even for days. I've recently been on a sustained vigilant daily search (like the 'Hunt for Red October') to track the bacterial growth cycle from the red blood cells. I wanted to see if I could replicate what I filmed before but have found that it's not so easy to do (so far).
It should be relatively easy but I think it's essential to get the timing right. I kept going back to check but in the end I'd missed the last stage of the cycle (the crucial bit where the worm-like bacteria is at full maturity). Frustratingly, the lighting quality had eroded badly and the bacteria had reached a die-off point. I will get it right with a new blood sample soon.
What you say about microtubules is interesting. I've seen many of these threads from the decaying red blood cells after some time on the slide. Forming a grid of tubules? I suppose you're referring to the web-like morass of threads that appear? Yes, I have seen that take shape from the rotting detritus, the resultant battle-zone. It's a bit depressing to witness. Yes, I'm in England.
These are self assembling nanomaterials which will slowly keep assembling. Nanotechnology. But not necessarily a robot. The more it jives around via brownian motion and RF agitation the more it will collide into other compatible Parts. Pfizer and many other drugs have these materials clearly bisible in them and you will find them in bloods also.
Thanks for your valued comment, Karl. You may well be right but I'm not currently persuaded on this. I'm with you on nanotech invasion via the hydrogels and self-assembly nanoparticles but I'm tending to veer towards a combination and diabolical collaboration between nanotech and CDB (Cross Domain Bacteria as laid out by Clifford Carnicom).
Although this snakey "thing" is mechanical and jerky in movement, I'm now thinking it's possibly hybrid (engineered) bacteria (CDB) that performs an engineered role in association with the engineered nanotech. Maybe these hybrid bacteria are being utilised to thrash about and collide other nanoparticles in order to assist the overall self-assembly of nanotech?
I believe the Dystopian Plotters have unleashed stealth engineered bacteria on humanity alongside stealth engineered nanotech. A transhumanists' dream of merging synthetic biology with electro-mechanical nanotechnology. "They" need the Trojan horse hybrid bacteria to weaken biological defences (nobble red blood cells) and open the gates for the nanotech invaders.
It seems to have the jerky movement of a spirochete?
Thank you, Patti. I think you may be right. Assuming it's a bacteria, I've narrowed it down to this rough area of rod-type bacteria but not specifically spirochete. The jerky or snakey movement reveals the 'joints' but there's maybe one or two other possible variants, a corkscrew one and a filamentous one.
I've also observed these in brightfield - a string of many dots threaded together. They do jerk about almost mechanically and they're several microns long.
Are you using 40x oil or something else?
For these darkfield video clips I was using no oil, only the 40X Objective. I sometimes use the oil with the 100X Objective for nitty-gritty zooming into maximum detail but it was not possible to use with this fast-moving bacteria or bot.
Have you done any brightfield with blood. Sometimes I see more with that?
Yes - and I agree with you, it's often better for seeing details, including the bacteria. I usually start with brightfield, scoot around the slide to get a good overall picture of key features, then switch to darkfield. Darkfield is fabulous for colourful detail if you get it right but it can be fraught with problems if certain things go wrong (in my early experience of using it).
Unfortunately, I had problems with darkfield for many weeks which was extremely frustrating. The oil kept running off the oil immersion unit and failing to link to the under side of the slide. I discovered that it was crucial to use an alcohol wipe, not a paper tissue, for cleaning off after use. Also, the connecting screw got worn out in the process, so I may need a replacement screw before long.
Nigel I found microscopy on YouTube to be immensely helpful in identifying bacteria and parasitic infections in blood cells and outside of them. I still go there and search to identify what I'm seeing. It's helped me a lot. We cannot see viruses unless we have a university level electron microscope. But mycoplasmas and everything else is fair game.
Thanks, Patti. Yes, I've found quite a lot on YouTube to my surprise. Erm, on 'viruses' though, I'm squarely in the 'no virus exists' camp, as none has ever been proven to exist EVER (Drs. Baileys, Cowan, Kaufman and Christine Massey etc). So, I regard 'viruses' as a tool of medical oppression that fuelled the Political Plandemics (1 & 2) 100 years apart AND the entire fake and toxic 'vaccine' industry.
Nigel even some ofthe corkscrew ones have jerky movements. There are lots of examples of these on YouTube microscopy sites. However I have some scope pictures of a large heavy looking silver colored parasite with what looks like eyes on a large head and body that trails off slimmer to its end. Found it in a doc friends blood 2 years ago. Other smaller ones were also present.
Yikes! Eyes and a large head and body! It's fatal to look down the microscope. It's quite shocking as it reveals all sorts of horrors. My fear is that any of these bacterial 'worm-like' variants might be really quite long (100_ microns). Some of the large filaments I've photographed (such as in my last post of yesterday) were snake-like. I keep coming across snake-like clues. Quite creepy and scary, especially after watching Maria Crisler talking to Dr. Mihalcea recently ... on snakey worms in the body. https://rumble.com/v4owm6l-episode-15-ai-nanotech-and-synthetic-biology-in-humanity-conversation-with-.html
It's great to be talking with you. Have you seen the strands that form up in vaxed blood that wrap rbcs into the strands formation? I have a lots of pictures of those.
It's good to be talking with you, too. No, I don't think I've seen those strands. That sounds interesting. It sounds like some form of goulish enslavement process, readying the rbcs for parasitic devourment.
You're right, we are the test bed and our survival is not their top priority. They don't care about our health, safety and well-being at all. They're trying to kill us off through stealth vectors - in order to 'save the planet' ... for themselves and their technocratic New World Order.
I'm confident that although I've seen horrible microscopy images from my own blood samples, my immunity is still strong enough to keep any invasive bacteria or nanobot at bay. (Same applies to most people, of course).
'The Thing' (somatid/bacteria/bot) in these video clips has grown on the microscope slide after about 2 hours - unchallenged by an active immune system response - but inside the body, hopefully, that's a different matter; any invader should get terminated by my trusty white blood cells. However, the nagging worry is that there may be significant invasion of these things. Who knows? It's not over 'till it's over, as the saying goes.
Nigel leave your slide on the scope overnight and see if microtubules start growing out of the blood on the slide. They will try to connect up with nearby tubeless to form a grid. Confirm this for me. I'm in the US are you in the UK?
Yes, I do routinely leave my slide on the scope overnight or even for days. I've recently been on a sustained vigilant daily search (like the 'Hunt for Red October') to track the bacterial growth cycle from the red blood cells. I wanted to see if I could replicate what I filmed before but have found that it's not so easy to do (so far).
It should be relatively easy but I think it's essential to get the timing right. I kept going back to check but in the end I'd missed the last stage of the cycle (the crucial bit where the worm-like bacteria is at full maturity). Frustratingly, the lighting quality had eroded badly and the bacteria had reached a die-off point. I will get it right with a new blood sample soon.
What you say about microtubules is interesting. I've seen many of these threads from the decaying red blood cells after some time on the slide. Forming a grid of tubules? I suppose you're referring to the web-like morass of threads that appear? Yes, I have seen that take shape from the rotting detritus, the resultant battle-zone. It's a bit depressing to witness. Yes, I'm in England.
No I actually meant microtubules. Go to my Substack and look at some of my former posts. They should be there.
I just 'followed' you and still I'm getting blanked. This is strange, perhaps another Substack glitch?
I would if I could - "Sorry that page is missing" and "profile not found" are all I get when clicking on your Substack messsages. You are blanked out.